Max Basing vs Fitriadi M Rifqi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Sep at 06:15 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Basing vs F. M Rifqi

GBR
3
Win
Played
0
Win

INA
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Basing 3 - 0 Rifqi
They have played 6 sets in total, with Max Basing winning 6 and Fitriadi M Rifqi winning 0. The last match between Max Basing and Fitriadi M Rifqi was at the M25 Bali, 11-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Max Basing getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Basing | 3 |
| Rifqi | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Bali(09-11-25)
(SF) M25 Bali(09-06-25)
(SF) M15 Nakhon Pathom(08-30-25)
M. Basing vs F. M. Rifqi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 68.64% (81-37) | Career Total W/L | 58.82% (110-77) |
| 3 | Hard | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Basing vs F. M. Rifqi Match Preview:
- Rifqi has shown better form on second serve, securing 44.31% of points compared to Basing's 37.34% over the past six months. How important is this stat in predictions? It significantly correlates with match outcomes.
- In return games, both players exhibit similar proficiency, with Rifqi leading slightly by winning 43.49% of opponents’ second serve points versus Basing's 43.13%.
- When under pressure, Rifqi outperforms Basing by saving 56.02% of breakpoints, whereas Basing's rate is 45.11%.
- Considering overall performance, Rifqi holds a 66.67% win rate in the last year versus Basing's higher 81.25% success rate.
- Surface preferences differ, with Rifqi excelling on indoor hard courts (67% win rate), while Basing prefers grass (71% win rate).
- Both participants frequently played at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, where Basing leads with an 82.14% victory rate compared to Rifqi's 66.67%.
- Their direct encounters have consistently favored Basing, who has won all four sets in their two previous matches.
- In terms of opponent quality, Basing faced slightly higher-ranked players (average rank 380.97) than Rifqi (average rank 393.8) over the last year.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Basing has an advantage with a 73% win rate in such situations versus Rifqi's 54%.
- Rifqi is more effective at converting breakpoints recently, achieving a 35.21% success rate compared to Basing’s 27.91%.
Editorial Prediction (September 11, 2025, UTC):
Examining both current form and historical data, Rifqi demonstrates a superior performance in second serve points won, as well as a slightly better return game. This may provide him a slight edge in terms of service game performance.
However, Basing's higher match win percentage over the last year, combined with his dominant head-to-head record against Rifqi, highlights his likely superiority when they face off.
Furthermore, Basing's experience against stronger opponents and his proficiency in deciding sets bolster his case as the likely victor.
Given these considerations, Basing appears more likely to maintain his winning streak in their upcoming encounter.
Max Basing vs Fitriadi M Rifqi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Basing vs F. M. Rifqi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 36 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:27:4 | Average Match Time | 1:27:4 |
| 74% (108/145) | 1st Serve % | 63% (95/151) |
| 66% (71/108) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (46/95) |
| 73% (27/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 60% (15/25) | Break Pts Won % | 23% (3/13) |
| 56% (85/151) | Return Points Win % | 32% (47/145) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Basing Recent Matches Played
F. M. Rifqi Recent Matches Played

M. Basing vs F. M. Rifqi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.64% (81/37) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.82% (110/77) |
| 63.50% (167/96) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.34% (240/186) |
| 55.38% (1334/1075) | Games Win/Loss | 52.39% (2104/1912) |
| 72.34% (68/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.14% (100/72) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (10/5) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 73 | Aces Total | 249 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 199 | Total Double Faults | 376 |
| 1:20:11 | Average Match Time | 1:25:36 |
| 418.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.04 |
| 71% (4324/6110) | 1st Serve % | 65% (6412/9797) |
| 66% (2833/4324) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (4219/6412) |
| 52% (924/1786) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1720/3385) |
| 47% (332/702) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (449/1032) |
| 44% (2648/6031) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4045/9840) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 73.68% (14/5) | Challenger W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 67.68% (67/32) | Futures W/L | 59.12% (107/74) |
| 68% (78/114) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (107/184) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 64% (16/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (25/51) |
| 74% (23/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (31/53) |
| 93% (75/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (97/86) |
| 7% (75/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (97/11) |
| 23% (43/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (90/23) |